» Articles » PMID: 10381708

Beta Blockade After Myocardial Infarction: Systematic Review and Meta Regression Analysis

Overview
Journal BMJ
Specialty General Medicine
Date 1999 Jun 25
PMID 10381708
Citations 293
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To assess the effectiveness of beta blockers in short term treatment for acute myocardial infarction and in longer term secondary prevention; to examine predictive factors that may influence outcome and therefore choice of drug; and to examine the clinical importance of the results in the light of current treatment.

Design: Systematic review of randomised controlled trials.

Setting: Randomised controlled trials.

Subjects: Patients with acute or past myocardial infarction.

Intervention: beta Blockers compared with control.

Main Outcome Measures: All cause mortality and non-fatal reinfarction.

Results: Overall, 5477 of 54 234 patients (10.1%) randomised to beta blockers or control died. We identified a 23% reduction in the odds of death in long term trials (95% confidence interval 15% to 31%), but only a 4% reduction in the odds of death in short term trials (-8% to 15%). Meta regression in long term trials did not identify a significant reduction in effectiveness in drugs with cardioselectivity but did identify a near significant trend towards decreased benefit in drugs with intrinsic sympathomimetic activity. Most evidence is available for propranolol, timolol, and metoprolol. In long term trials, the number needed to treat for 2 years to avoid a death is 42, which compares favourably with other treatments for patients with acute or past myocardial infarction.

Conclusions: beta Blockers are effective in long term secondary prevention after myocardial infarction, but they are underused in such cases and lead to avoidable mortality and morbidity.

Citing Articles

Heterogeneous and Composite Bioinks for 3D-Bioprinting of Complex Tissue.

Rasouli R, Sweeney C, Frampton J Biomed Mater Devices. 2025; 3(1):108-126.

PMID: 40028238 PMC: 11868245. DOI: 10.1007/s44174-024-00171-7.


Pharmacotherapy, Lifestyle Modification, and Cardiac Rehabilitation after Myocardial Infarction or Percutaneous Intervention.

Nguyen N, Michelis K US Cardiol. 2025; 19:e01.

PMID: 39980877 PMC: 11836608. DOI: 10.15420/usc.2024.34.


Reconsidering the role of beta-blockers in post-myocardial infarction patients with preserved ejection fraction.

Kalsoom S, Zaman M Future Cardiol. 2025; 21(4):207-209.

PMID: 39951013 PMC: 11901375. DOI: 10.1080/14796678.2025.2465214.


Beta-Blocker Therapy After Myocardial Infarction.

Cataldo Miranda P, Gasevic D, Trin C, Stub D, Zoungas S, Kaye D JACC Adv. 2025; 4(3):101582.

PMID: 39889325 PMC: 11834082. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101582.


Stabilizing Stable Coronary Artery Disease: No Beta-Blocker, No Problem?.

Chi K, Nanna M JACC Adv. 2025; 4(2):101569.

PMID: 39826439 PMC: 11787414. DOI: 10.1016/j.jacadv.2024.101569.


References
1.
. Collaborative overview of randomised trials of antiplatelet therapy--I: Prevention of death, myocardial infarction, and stroke by prolonged antiplatelet therapy in various categories of patients. Antiplatelet Trialists' Collaboration. BMJ. 1994; 308(6921):81-106. PMC: 2539220. View

2.
. Effect of long-term oral anticoagulant treatment on mortality and cardiovascular morbidity after myocardial infarction. Anticoagulants in the Secondary Prevention of Events in Coronary Thrombosis (ASPECT) Research Group. Lancet. 1994; 343(8896):499-503. View

3.
Fleiss J, Gross A . Meta-analysis in epidemiology, with special reference to studies of the association between exposure to environmental tobacco smoke and lung cancer: a critique. J Clin Epidemiol. 1991; 44(2):127-39. DOI: 10.1016/0895-4356(91)90261-7. View

4.
Eccles M, Bradshaw C . Use of secondary prophylaxis against myocardial infarction in the north of England. BMJ. 1991; 302(6768):91-2. PMC: 1668878. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.302.6768.91. View

5.
Schulz K, Chalmers I, Hayes R, Altman D . Empirical evidence of bias. Dimensions of methodological quality associated with estimates of treatment effects in controlled trials. JAMA. 1995; 273(5):408-12. DOI: 10.1001/jama.273.5.408. View