» Articles » PMID: 10376871

MRNA Surveillance in Eukaryotes: Kinetic Proofreading of Proper Translation Termination As Assessed by MRNP Domain Organization?

Overview
Journal RNA
Specialty Molecular Biology
Date 1999 Jun 22
PMID 10376871
Citations 48
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

In the last few years it has become clear that a conserved mRNA degradation system, referred to as mRNA surveillance, exists in eukaryotic cells to degrade aberrant mRNAs. This process plays an important role in checking that mRNAs have been properly synthesized and functions, at least in part, to increase the fidelity of gene expression by degrading aberrant mRNAs that, if translated, would produce truncated proteins. A critical issue is how normal and aberrant mRNAs are distinguished and how that distinction leads to differences in mRNA stability. Recent results suggest a model with three main points. First, mRNPs have a domain organization that is, in part, a reflection of the completion of nuclear pre-mRNA processing events. Second, the critical aspect of distinguishing a normal from an aberrant mRNA is the environment of the translation termination codon as determined by the organization of the mRNP domains. Third, the cell distinguishes proper from improper termination through an internal clock that is the rate of ATP hydrolysis by Upf1p. If termination is completed before ATP hydrolysis, the mRNA is protected from mRNA degradation. Conversely, if termination is slow, then ATP hydrolysis and a structural rearrangement occurs before termination is completed, which affects the fate of the terminating ribosome in a manner that fails to stabilize the mRNA. This proposed system of distinguishing normal from aberrant transcripts is similar to, but distinct from other systems of kinetic proofreading that affect the accuracy of other biogenic processes such as translation accuracy and spliceosome assembly.

Citing Articles

UPF1-Mediated RNA Decay-Danse Macabre in a Cloud.

Lavysh D, Neu-Yilik G Biomolecules. 2020; 10(7).

PMID: 32635561 PMC: 7407380. DOI: 10.3390/biom10070999.


The RNA-binding protein PTBP1 promotes ATPase-dependent dissociation of the RNA helicase UPF1 to protect transcripts from nonsense-mediated mRNA decay.

Fritz S, Ranganathan S, Wang C, Hogg J J Biol Chem. 2020; 295(33):11613-11625.

PMID: 32571872 PMC: 7450115. DOI: 10.1074/jbc.RA120.013824.


The Function of Pre-mRNA Alternative Splicing in Mammal Spermatogenesis.

Song H, Wang L, Chen D, Li F Int J Biol Sci. 2020; 16(1):38-48.

PMID: 31892844 PMC: 6930371. DOI: 10.7150/ijbs.34422.


CRISPR-induced exon skipping is dependent on premature termination codon mutations.

Sui T, Song Y, Liu Z, Chen M, Deng J, Xu Y Genome Biol. 2018; 19(1):164.

PMID: 30333044 PMC: 6193291. DOI: 10.1186/s13059-018-1532-z.


Nonsense-Mediated mRNA Decay Begins Where Translation Ends.

Karousis E, Muhlemann O Cold Spring Harb Perspect Biol. 2018; 11(2).

PMID: 29891560 PMC: 6360860. DOI: 10.1101/cshperspect.a032862.


References
1.
He F, Peltz S, Donahue J, Rosbash M, Jacobson A . Stabilization and ribosome association of unspliced pre-mRNAs in a yeast upf1- mutant. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 1993; 90(15):7034-8. PMC: 47070. DOI: 10.1073/pnas.90.15.7034. View

2.
Dahlseid J, Puziss J, SHIRLEY R, Atkin A, Hieter P, Culbertson M . Accumulation of mRNA coding for the ctf13p kinetochore subunit of Saccharomyces cerevisiae depends on the same factors that promote rapid decay of nonsense mRNAs. Genetics. 1998; 150(3):1019-35. PMC: 1460377. DOI: 10.1093/genetics/150.3.1019. View

3.
Peltz S, Brown A, Jacobson A . mRNA destabilization triggered by premature translational termination depends on at least three cis-acting sequence elements and one trans-acting factor. Genes Dev. 1993; 7(9):1737-54. DOI: 10.1101/gad.7.9.1737. View

4.
Pulak R, Anderson P . mRNA surveillance by the Caenorhabditis elegans smg genes. Genes Dev. 1993; 7(10):1885-97. DOI: 10.1101/gad.7.10.1885. View

5.
Burgess S, Guthrie C . Beat the clock: paradigms for NTPases in the maintenance of biological fidelity. Trends Biochem Sci. 1993; 18(10):381-4. DOI: 10.1016/0968-0004(93)90094-4. View