» Articles » PMID: 10363280

Trypanosoma Brucei Spp. Development in the Tsetse Fly: Characterization of the Post-mesocyclic Stages in the Foregut and Proboscis

Overview
Journal Parasitology
Specialty Parasitology
Date 1999 Jun 11
PMID 10363280
Citations 114
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Post-mesocyclic development of Trypanosoma brucei in the tsetse fly in its migration from midgut to salivary glands, was revisited by sequential microdissection, morphometry and DNA-cytofluorometry. This development started by day 6 after the infective feed, with passage of mesocyclic midgut trypomastigotes through proventriculus and upward migration along foregut and proboscis to the salivary gland ducts. Kinetics of salivary gland infection showed that colonization of the salivary glands by epimastigotes occurred only during the time-limited presence of this developmental phase in the foregut and proboscis. Post-mesocyclic trypanosomes in the foregut and proboscis were pleomorphic, with 4 morphological stages in various constant proportions and present all through from proventriculus up to the salivary gland ducts: 67% long trypomastigotes, 27% long epimastigotes, 4% long epimastigotes undergoing asymmetric cell division and 2% short epimastigotes. Measurements of DNA content demonstrated a predominant tetraploidy for 67% of these trypanosomes, the remainder consisting of the homogeneous diploid short epimastigotes and some long epimastigotes. According to the experimental data, the following sequence of trypanosome differentiation in the foregut and proboscis is proposed as the most obvious hypothesis. Incoming mesocyclic trypomastigotes (2N) from the ectoperitrophic anterior midgut start to replicate DNA to a 4N level, are arrested at this point, and differentiate into the long epimastigote (4N) which give rise, by an asymmetric cell division, to 2 unequal, diploid daughter cells: a long, probably dead-end long epimastigote and a short epimastigote. The latter is responsible for the epimastigote colonization of the salivary glands if launched at the vicinity of the gland epithelium by the asymmetric dividing epimastigote.

Citing Articles

Advances in the Immunology of the Host-Parasite Interactions in African Trypanosomosis, including Single-Cell Transcriptomics.

Choi B, Vu H, Vu H, Radwanska M, Magez S Pathogens. 2024; 13(3).

PMID: 38535532 PMC: 10975194. DOI: 10.3390/pathogens13030188.


A sticky situation: When trypanosomatids attach to insect tissues.

Povelones M, Holmes N, Povelones M PLoS Pathog. 2023; 19(12):e1011854.

PMID: 38128049 PMC: 10734937. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1011854.


Prevalence of Spiroplasma and interaction with wild Glossina tachinoides microbiota.

Dera K, Dieng M, Moyaba P, Ouedraogo G, Pagabeleguem S, Njokou F Parasite. 2023; 30:62.

PMID: 38117272 PMC: 10732139. DOI: 10.1051/parasite/2023064.


Development of the livestock pathogen Trypanosoma (Nannomonas) simiae in the tsetse fly with description of putative sexual stages from the proboscis.

Peacock L, Kay C, Collett C, Bailey M, Gibson W Parasit Vectors. 2023; 16(1):231.

PMID: 37434196 PMC: 10337175. DOI: 10.1186/s13071-023-05847-5.


The Trypanosoma brucei MISP family of invariant proteins is co-expressed with BARP as triple helical bundle structures on the surface of salivary gland forms, but is dispensable for parasite development within the tsetse vector.

Casas-Sanchez A, Ramaswamy R, Perally S, Haines L, Rose C, Aguilera-Flores M PLoS Pathog. 2023; 19(3):e1011269.

PMID: 36996244 PMC: 10089363. DOI: 10.1371/journal.ppat.1011269.