» Articles » PMID: 10360475

Effects of Amifostine on Cisplatin Induced DNA Adduct Formation and Toxicity in Malignant Glioma and Normal Tissues in Rat

Overview
Journal J Neurooncol
Publisher Springer
Date 1999 Jun 9
PMID 10360475
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The chemoprotective effect of amifostine (WR2721) was studied in a BDIX rat model with intracerebral BT4C glioma implants. Twenty-one rats were given cisplatin 5 mg/kg i.p., 21 were given amifostine 200 mg/kg i.p. + cisplatin 5 mg/kg i.p. Ten rats served as untreated controls. An immunohistochemical method for analysis of cisplatin-DNA adducts was used to elucidate the adduct formation in tumor, normal brain and kidney. Tumor volume and serum creatinine level were analysed 10 days after treatment. In animals pretreated with amifostine there was a delayed adduct formation rate in the normal brain, and in the kidney cortex the number of tubular cells with extremely high adduct level was reduced. No difference in adduct formation was seen in tumors. Tumor volume was significantly larger following amifostine + cisplatin (66% of controls) compared to cisplatin alone (38% of controls). Weight loss was, however, severe in rats given cisplatin alone. In the tumor growth study only 3 out of 11 rats treated with cisplatin 5 mg/kg alone survived until time of sacrifice at 10 days, whereas all those pretreated with amifostine survived. Mean serum creatinine was 48 micromol/l (controls), 146 micromol/l (cisplatin) and 59 micromol/l (amifostine + cisplatin). A marked reduction of histopathological renal changes was found when amifostine was added. Amifostine thus significantly reduced general and renal toxicity of cisplatin. The tumor growth retardation was stronger when cisplatin was given alone but this is probably related to general toxicity and malnutrition indirectly supported by the fact that amifostine did not significantly reduce cisplatin-DNA adduct formation in tumors. The results of the present study suggest that amifostine may have a role in increasing the therapeutic ratio of cisplatin, also in the treatment of malignant glioma.

Citing Articles

Nasal administration of mesenchymal stem cells restores cisplatin-induced cognitive impairment and brain damage in mice.

Chiu G, Boukelmoune N, Chiang A, Peng B, Rao V, Kingsley C Oncotarget. 2018; 9(85):35581-35597.

PMID: 30473752 PMC: 6238972. DOI: 10.18632/oncotarget.26272.


Amifostine (WR2721) confers DNA protection to in vivo cisplatin-treated murine peripheral blood leukocytes.

Prieto Gonzalez E, Fuchs A, Sanchez G Dose Response. 2009; 7(3):234-46.

PMID: 19809542 PMC: 2754537. DOI: 10.2203/dose-response.08-026.Prieto.


Peripheral neuropathy and cancer.

Forman A Curr Oncol Rep. 2003; 6(1):20-5.

PMID: 14664756 DOI: 10.1007/s11912-996-0005-9.

References
1.
Korst A, Boven E, van der Sterre M, van der Vijgh W . Pharmacokinetics of cisplatin with and without amifostine in tumour-bearing nude mice. Eur J Cancer. 1998; 34(3):412-6. DOI: 10.1016/s0959-8049(97)10012-0. View

2.
Johnsson A, Olsson C, Nygren O, Nilsson M, Seiving B, Cavallin-Stahl E . Pharmacokinetics and tissue distribution of cisplatin in nude mice: platinum levels and cisplatin-DNA adducts. Cancer Chemother Pharmacol. 1995; 37(1-2):23-31. DOI: 10.1007/BF00685625. View

3.
Aguilera J, Ward J, Smoluk G, Fahey R . Uptake of WR-2721 derivatives by cells in culture: identification of the transported form of the drug. Cancer Res. 1988; 48(13):3634-40. View

4.
Terheggen P, Floot B, Scherer E, BEGG A, Den Engelse L . Immunocytochemical detection of interaction products of cis-diamminedichloroplatinum(II) and cis-diammine(1,1-cyclobutanedicarboxylato)platinum(II) with DNA in rodent tissue sections. Cancer Res. 1987; 47(24 Pt 1):6719-25. View

5.
Glover D, Grabelsky S, Fox K, Weiler C, Cannon L, Glick J . Clinical trials of WR-2721 and cis-platinum. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 1989; 16(5):1201-4. DOI: 10.1016/0360-3016(89)90283-6. View