» Articles » PMID: 10334518

Comparative Efficacy of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Dukes' B Versus Dukes' C Colon Cancer: Results from Four National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project Adjuvant Studies (C-01, C-02, C-03, and C-04)

Overview
Journal J Clin Oncol
Specialty Oncology
Date 1999 May 20
PMID 10334518
Citations 121
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose: Although the benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy has been clearly established in patients with Dukes' C colon cancer, such benefit has been questioned in patients with Dukes' B disease. To determine whether patients with Dukes' B disease benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy and to evaluate the magnitude of the benefit, compared with that observed in Dukes' C patients, we examined the relative efficacy of adjuvant chemotherapy according to Dukes' stage in four sequential National Surgical Adjuvant Breast and Bowel Project trials (C-01, C-02, C-03, and C-04) that compared different adjuvant chemotherapy regimens with each other or with no adjuvant treatment.

Patients And Methods: The four trials included Dukes' B and C patients and were conducted between 1977 and 1990. The eligibility criteria and follow-up requirements were similar for all four trials. Protocol C-01 compared adjuvant semustine, vincristine, and fluorouracil (5-FU) (MOF regimen) with operation alone. Protocol C-02 compared the perioperative administration of a portal venous infusion of 5-FU with operation alone. Protocol C-03 compared adjuvant 5-FU and leucovorin (LV) with adjuvant MOF. Protocol C-04 compared adjuvant 5-FU and LV with 5-FU and levamisole (LEV) and with the combination of 5-FU, LV, and LEV.

Results: Forty-one percent of the patients included in these four trials had resected Dukes' B tumors. In all four studies, the overall, disease-free, and recurrence-free survival improvement noted for all patients was evident in both Dukes' B and Dukes' C patients. When the relative efficacy of chemotherapy was examined, there was always an observed reduction in mortality, recurrence, or disease-free survival event, irrespective of Dukes' stage, and in most instances, the reduction was as great or greater for Dukes' B patients as for Dukes' C patients. When data from all four trials were examined in a combined analysis, the mortality reduction was 30% for Dukes' B patients versus 18% for Dukes' C patients. The mortality reduction in Dukes' B patients occurred irrespective of the presence or absence of adverse prognostic factors.

Conclusion: Patients with Dukes' B colon cancer benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy and should be presented with this treatment option. Regardless of the presence or absence of other clinical prognostic factors, Dukes' B patients seem to benefit from chemotherapy administration.

Citing Articles

Integrated multiplex analysis of cell death regulators in stage II colorectal cancer suggests patients with 'persister' cell profiles fail to benefit from adjuvant chemotherapy.

Cho S, McDonough E, Graf J, Shia J, Firat C, Urganci N BMJ Oncol. 2025; 3(1):e000362.

PMID: 39886119 PMC: 11347685. DOI: 10.1136/bmjonc-2024-000362.


Association of Rural Residence and Receipt of Guideline-Concordant Care for Locoregional Colon Cancer.

Honaker M, Irish W, Parikh A, Snyder R Ann Surg Oncol. 2023; 30(6):3538-3546.

PMID: 36933082 DOI: 10.1245/s10434-023-13340-7.


Simulation studies, 3D QSAR and molecular docking on a point mutation of protein kinase B with flavonoids targeting ovarian Cancer.

Ajjarapu S, Tiwari A, Taj G, Singh D, Singh S, Kumar S BMC Pharmacol Toxicol. 2021; 22(1):68.

PMID: 34727985 PMC: 8564994. DOI: 10.1186/s40360-021-00512-y.


Patient perspectives on treatment decision-making under clinical uncertainty: chemotherapy treatment decisions among stage II colon cancer patients.

Brotzman L, Crookes D, Austin J, Neugut A, Shelton R Transl Behav Med. 2021; 11(10):1905-1914.

PMID: 34042154 PMC: 8541697. DOI: 10.1093/tbm/ibab040.


Impact of Tumor Side on Clinical Outcomes in Stage II and III Colon Cancer With Known Microsatellite Instability Status.

Akce M, Zakka K, Jiang R, Williamson S, Alese O, Shaib W Front Oncol. 2021; 11:592351.

PMID: 33859934 PMC: 8042136. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.592351.