» Articles » PMID: 10329609

The Development of M Cells in Peyer's Patches is Restricted to Specialized Dome-associated Crypts

Overview
Journal Am J Pathol
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Pathology
Date 1999 May 18
PMID 10329609
Citations 25
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

It is controversial whether the membranous (M) cells of the Peyer's patches represent a separate cell line or develop from enterocytes under the influence of lymphocytes on the domes. To answer this question, the crypts that produce the dome epithelial cells were studied and the distribution of M cells over the domes was determined in mice. The Ulex europaeus agglutinin was used to detect M cells in mouse Peyer's patches. Confocal microscopy with lectin-gold labeling on ultrathin sections, scanning electron microscopy, and laminin immuno-histochemistry were combined to characterize the cellular composition and the structure of the dome-associated crypts and the dome epithelium. In addition, the sites of lymphocyte invasion into the dome epithelium were studied after removal of the epithelium using scanning electron microscopy. The domes of Peyer's patches were supplied with epithelial cells that derived from two types of crypt: specialized dome-associated crypts and ordinary crypts differing not only in shape, size, and cellular composition but also in the presence of M cell precursors. When epithelial cells derived from ordinary crypts entered the domes, they formed converging radial strips devoid of M cells. In contrast to the M cells, the sites where lymphocytes invaded the dome epithelium were not arranged in radial strips, but randomly distributed over the domes. M cell development is restricted to specialized dome-associated crypts. Only dome epithelial cells that derive from these specialized crypts differentiate into M cells. It is concluded that M cells represent a separate cell line that is induced in the dome-associated crypts by still unknown, probably diffusible lymphoid factors.

Citing Articles

Thymic Mimetic Cells: Ontogeny as Immunology.

Michelson D, Mathis D Annu Rev Cell Dev Biol. 2024; 40(1):283-300.

PMID: 38608315 PMC: 11446667. DOI: 10.1146/annurev-cellbio-112122-023316.


Hnf4 activates mimetic-cell enhancers to recapitulate gut and liver development within the thymus.

Michelson D, Zuo C, Verzi M, Benoist C, Mathis D J Exp Med. 2023; 220(10).

PMID: 37399024 PMC: 10318407. DOI: 10.1084/jem.20230461.


M Cells: Intelligent Engineering of Mucosal Immune Surveillance.

Dillon A, Lo D Front Immunol. 2019; 10:1499.

PMID: 31312204 PMC: 6614372. DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2019.01499.


Infection-generated electric field in gut epithelium drives bidirectional migration of macrophages.

Sun Y, Reid B, Ferreira F, Luxardi G, Ma L, Lokken K PLoS Biol. 2019; 17(4):e3000044.

PMID: 30964858 PMC: 6456179. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pbio.3000044.


Induction of Colonic M Cells during Intestinal Inflammation.

Bennett K, Parnell E, Sanscartier C, Parks S, Chen G, Nair M Am J Pathol. 2016; 186(5):1166-79.

PMID: 26948422 PMC: 4861757. DOI: 10.1016/j.ajpath.2015.12.015.


References
1.
Falk P, Roth K, Gordon J . Lectins are sensitive tools for defining the differentiation programs of mouse gut epithelial cell lineages. Am J Physiol. 1994; 266(6 Pt 1):G987-1003. DOI: 10.1152/ajpgi.1994.266.6.G987. View

2.
Schmidt G, Wilkinson M, Ponder B . Cell migration pathway in the intestinal epithelium: an in situ marker system using mouse aggregation chimeras. Cell. 1985; 40(2):425-9. DOI: 10.1016/0092-8674(85)90156-4. View

3.
LOW F, McClugage S . Microdissection by ultrasonication: scanning electron microscopy of the epithelial basal lamina of the alimentary canal in the rat. Am J Anat. 1984; 169(2):137-47. DOI: 10.1002/aja.1001690203. View

4.
Gebert A, Rothkotter H, Pabst R . M cells in Peyer's patches of the intestine. Int Rev Cytol. 1996; 167:91-159. DOI: 10.1016/s0074-7696(08)61346-7. View

5.
Bhalla D, Owen R . Cell renewal and migration in lymphoid follicles of Peyer's patches and cecum--an autoradiographic study in mice. Gastroenterology. 1982; 82(2):232-42. View