» Articles » PMID: 10325754

Evaluation of a National Surveillance Unit

Overview
Journal Arch Dis Child
Specialty Pediatrics
Date 1999 May 18
PMID 10325754
Citations 10
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Aim: The Australian Paediatric Surveillance Unit (APSU) facilitates national active surveillance of uncommon childhood conditions. This study assessed whether it fulfilled its objectives and satisfied criteria established by the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC) for evaluating surveillance systems.

Methods: Anonymous questionnaires were sent to users of the system, individual studies were reviewed, and data were collected from independent sources.

Results: Seven hundred and sixty six clinicians, 48 investigators, and 15 public health professionals responded to the questionnaires. Clinicians reported that the APSU was useful, 33% saying information provided by the APSU informed or changed their clinical practice. Most (88%) reported that completing monthly report cards was not a burden. Impact on policy development was limited by suboptimal dissemination of information to public health professionals. Flexibility and timeliness were limited by design. Estimated sensitivity of APSU studies ranged from 92% (congenital rubella) to 31% (drowning/near drowning). Positive predictive value of notified cases was over 70% for most studies.

Conclusion: The APSU fulfils most of its objectives and meets CDC criteria salient to these. Ways in which the APSU could be improved have been identified, as have methodological challenges and limitations in applying CDC guidelines to this type of unit.

Citing Articles

Evaluation of public health surveillance systems in refugee settlements in Uganda, 2016-2019: lessons learned.

Ario A, Barigye E, Nkonwa I, Ogwal J, Opio D, Bulage L Confl Health. 2022; 16(1):15.

PMID: 35395945 PMC: 8990451. DOI: 10.1186/s13031-022-00449-x.


Effectiveness of Implementation of Electronic Malaria Information System as the National Malaria Surveillance System in Thailand.

Ma S, Lawpoolsri S, Soonthornworasiri N, Khamsiriwatchara A, Jandee K, Taweeseneepitch K JMIR Public Health Surveill. 2016; 2(1):e20.

PMID: 27227156 PMC: 4869224. DOI: 10.2196/publichealth.5347.


The relationship between MECP2 mutation type and health status and service use trajectories over time in a Rett syndrome population.

Young D, Bebbington A, de Klerk N, Bower C, Nagarajan L, Leonard H Res Autism Spectr Disord. 2010; 5(1):442-449.

PMID: 21057653 PMC: 2968739. DOI: 10.1016/j.rasd.2010.06.007.


Rare disease surveillance: An international perspective.

Elliott E, Nicoll A, Lynn R, Marchessault V, Hirasing R, Ridley G Paediatr Child Health. 2010; 6(5):251-60.

PMID: 20084246 PMC: 2804555.


Canadian Paediatric Surveillance Program evaluation: An excellent report card.

Grenier D, Doherty J, MacDonald D, Scott J, Delage G, Medaglia A Paediatr Child Health. 2009; 9(6):379-84.

PMID: 19657428 PMC: 2721163. DOI: 10.1093/pch/9.6.379.


References
1.
Vogt R, LaRue D, Klaucke D, Jillson D . Comparison of an active and passive surveillance system of primary care providers for hepatitis, measles, rubella, and salmonellosis in Vermont. Am J Public Health. 1983; 73(7):795-7. PMC: 1650894. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.73.7.795. View

2.
Hinds M, SKAGGS J, Bergeisen G . Benefit-cost analysis of active surveillance of primary care physicians for hepatitis A. Am J Public Health. 1985; 75(2):176-7. PMC: 1645977. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.75.2.176. View

3.
Hall S, Glickman M . The British Paediatric Surveillance Unit. Arch Dis Child. 1988; 63(3):344-6. PMC: 1778771. DOI: 10.1136/adc.63.3.344. View

4.
Thacker S, PARRISH R, Trowbridge F . A method for evaluating systems of epidemiological surveillance. World Health Stat Q. 1988; 41(1):11-8. View

5.
Alperstein G, Vimpani G . Reducing the lead load in childhood. J Paediatr Child Health. 1994; 30(1):3-5. DOI: 10.1111/j.1440-1754.1994.tb00554.x. View