Regional Teaching Improvement Programs for Community-based Teachers
Overview
Affiliations
Purpose: Community-based clinical teachers provide an important cadre of faculty for medical education. This study was designed to examine the feasibility and value of an American College of Physicians-sponsored regional teaching improvement program for community-based teachers.
Subjects And Methods: We conducted five regional (Connecticut, New Hampshire/Vermont, New York, Ohio, and Virginia) 1- to 2-day teaching-improvement workshops for 282 faculty (49% community based, 51% university based). The workshops were conducted by regional facilitators trained by the Stanford Faculty Development Program using large group and small group instructional methods to teach participants a framework for analyzing teaching, to increase their repertoire of teaching behaviors, to define personal teaching goals, and to identify the educational needs of their teaching site. Participants used Likert ratings [1 (low) to 5 (high) scale] to assess workshop quality, facilitator effectiveness, and rewards for and barriers to teaching in their clinics. Using retrospective pre- and postintervention ratings, participants also assessed workshop impacts on teacher knowledge, attitudes, and skills. Finally, participants completed open-ended questions to identify recommended changes to improve their clinic as an educational site for students and residents.
Results: At all sites, participants evaluated the program as highly useful (4.6 +/- 0.6, mean +/- SD). Participants' ratings indicated that the program had a positive effect on their knowledge of teaching principles (4.0 +/- 0.9), an increase in their teaching ability (P <0.001), and an increase in their sense of integration with their affiliated institution (P <0.001).
Conclusions: Regional training of university and community faculty can be an effective way of promoting the improvement of teaching and the collaboration between community-based teachers and academic centers. National physician organizations and regionally based facilitators can provide important resources for the delivery of such training.
Kohan M, Changiz T, Yamani N BMC Med Educ. 2023; 23(1):910.
PMID: 38037063 PMC: 10690997. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-023-04863-4.
Renting N, Jaarsma D, Borleffs J, Slaets J, Cohen-Schotanus J, Gans R BMJ Open. 2023; 13(9):e076946.
PMID: 37770280 PMC: 10546104. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-076946.
Faculty Development for Community Preceptors: a Narrative Review of the Literature.
Alexandraki I, Baker R, Kern A, Dallaghan G, Seegmiller J J Gen Intern Med. 2023; 38(6):1501-1515.
PMID: 36701025 PMC: 9879558. DOI: 10.1007/s11606-023-08026-5.
Validation of the Physician Teaching Motivation Questionnaire (PTMQ).
Dybowski C, Harendza S BMC Med Educ. 2015; 15:166.
PMID: 26432551 PMC: 4592554. DOI: 10.1186/s12909-015-0448-5.
Davies R, Hanna E, Cott C Physiother Can. 2012; 63(2):224-33.
PMID: 22379263 PMC: 3076914. DOI: 10.3138/ptc.2010-07.