» Articles » PMID: 10220401

Targeted Cytoplasmic Irradiation with Alpha Particles Induces Mutations in Mammalian Cells

Overview
Specialty Science
Date 1999 Apr 29
PMID 10220401
Citations 100
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Ever since x-rays were shown to induce mutation in Drosophila more than 70 years ago, prevailing dogma considered the genotoxic effects of ionizing radiation, such as mutations and carcinogenesis, as being due mostly to direct damage to the nucleus. Although there was indication that alpha particle traversal through cellular cytoplasm was innocuous, the full impact remained unknown. The availability of the microbeam at the Radiological Research Accelerator Facility of Columbia University made it possible to target and irradiate the cytoplasm of individual cells in a highly localized spatial region. By using dual fluorochrome dyes (Hoechst and Nile Red) to locate nucleus and cellular cytoplasm, respectively, thereby avoiding inadvertent traversal of nuclei, we show here that cytoplasmic irradiation is mutagenic at the CD59 (S1) locus of human-hamster hybrid (AL) cells, while inflicting minimal cytotoxicity. The principal class of mutations induced are similar to those of spontaneous origin and are entirely different from those of nuclear irradiation. Furthermore, experiments with radical scavenger and inhibitor of intracellular glutathione indicated that the mutagenicity of cytoplasmic irradiation depends on generation of reactive oxygen species. These findings suggest that cytoplasm is an important target for genotoxic effects of ionizing radiation, particularly radon, the second leading cause of lung cancer in the United States. In addition, cytoplasmic traversal by alpha particles may be more dangerous than nuclear traversal, because the mutagenicity is accomplished by little or no killing of the target cells.

Citing Articles

AdipoRon Alleviates Liver Injury by Protecting Hepatocytes from Mitochondrial Damage Caused by Ionizing Radiation.

Liu Y, Xu Y, Ji H, Gao F, Ge R, Zhou D Int J Mol Sci. 2024; 25(20).

PMID: 39457060 PMC: 11508598. DOI: 10.3390/ijms252011277.


Therapy-induced senescence through the redox lens.

Robert M, Kennedy B, Crasta K Redox Biol. 2024; 74:103228.

PMID: 38865902 PMC: 11215421. DOI: 10.1016/j.redox.2024.103228.


Cell Death, by Any Other Name….

Kandouz M Cells. 2024; 13(4.

PMID: 38391938 PMC: 10886887. DOI: 10.3390/cells13040325.


Radiation-induced bystander effect and its clinical implications.

Tang H, Cai L, He X, Niu Z, Huang H, Hu W Front Oncol. 2023; 13:1124412.

PMID: 37091174 PMC: 10113613. DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2023.1124412.


X-rays-Induced Bystander Effect Consists in the Formation of DNA Breaks in a Calcium-Dependent Manner: Influence of the Experimental Procedure and the Individual Factor.

Restier-Verlet J, Joubert A, Ferlazzo M, Granzotto A, Sonzogni L, Al-Choboq J Biomolecules. 2023; 13(3).

PMID: 36979480 PMC: 10046354. DOI: 10.3390/biom13030542.


References
1.
Chapman J, Doern S, Reuvers A, Gillespie C, Chatterjee A, Blakely E . Radioprotection by DMSO of mammalian cells exposed to X-rays and to heavy charged-particle beams. Radiat Environ Biophys. 1979; 16(1):29-41. DOI: 10.1007/BF01326894. View

2.
Wei Y . Oxidative stress and mitochondrial DNA mutations in human aging. Proc Soc Exp Biol Med. 1998; 217(1):53-63. DOI: 10.3181/00379727-217-44205. View

3.
MUNRO T . The relative radiosensitivity of the nucleus and cytoplasm of Chinese hamster fibroblasts. Radiat Res. 1970; 42(3):451-70. View

4.
Hei T, Piao C, Sutter T, Willey J, Suzuki K . Cellular and molecular alterations in human epithelial cells transformed by high LET radiation. Adv Space Res. 1996; 18(1-2):137-48. DOI: 10.1016/0273-1177(95)00800-t. View

5.
Nagasawa H, Little J . Induction of sister chromatid exchanges by extremely low doses of alpha-particles. Cancer Res. 1992; 52(22):6394-6. View