» Articles » PMID: 10214600

Nurses' Recognition of Depression in Their Patients with Cancer

Overview
Specialties Nursing
Oncology
Date 1999 Apr 24
PMID 10214600
Citations 36
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Purpose/objectives: To determine the degree to which nurses recognize levels of depressive symptoms in their patients with cancer and to describe patient characteristics that influence the accuracy of nurses' perceptions of depressive symptoms.

Design: Descriptive, prospective correlational design.

Setting: 25 community-based ambulatory oncology clinics affiliated with Community Cancer Care of Indiana.

Sample: 40 clinic nurses rated the depression levels of 1,109 patients.

Methods: Patients completed the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (ZSDS) prior to their medical oncology clinic appointment. Nurses rated their patients' level of depressive symptoms, anxiety, and pain on a 0-10 numerical scale along with determining a performance status score.

Main Research Variables: Patient-rated depression and the nurse depression rating.

Findings: The most frequent agreement between nurses and patients was observed when patients reported little or no depressive symptoms. They were only concordant 29% and 14% of the time in the mild and moderate/severe ranges, respectively. Nurses' ratings were influenced most by patients' endorsement of frequent and obvious mood symptoms and nurse ratings of patients' anxiety and pain.

Conclusions: A marked tendency existed to underestimate the level of depressive symptoms in patients who were more severely depressed. Nurses' ratings were most influenced by symptoms such as crying, depressed mood, and medical factors that are useful but perhaps not the most reliable indicators of depression in this population.

Implications For Nursing Practice: Nurse assessment of depression might be improved if greater emphasis were placed on the more diagnostically reliable symptoms of depression and if screening tools for depression were incorporated into nursing practice.

Citing Articles

Early Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Psycho-Oncological Support: A Latent Class Analysis.

Schulze J, Coker P, von Kanel R, Euler S, Gunther M Oncology. 2023; 101(6):389-396.

PMID: 36977398 PMC: 10871688. DOI: 10.1159/000530353.


A systematic review of pharmacologic treatment efficacy for depression in older patients with cancer.

Rabin E, Kim M, Mozny A, Cardoza K, Bell A, Zhai L Brain Behav Immun Health. 2022; 21:100449.

PMID: 35368609 PMC: 8968450. DOI: 10.1016/j.bbih.2022.100449.


What if… I Asked Cancer Patients About Psychological Distress? Barriers in Psycho-Oncological Screening From the Perspective of Nurses-A Qualitative Analysis.

Dreismann L, Goretzki A, Ginger V, Zimmermann T Front Psychiatry. 2022; 12:786691.

PMID: 35153856 PMC: 8825354. DOI: 10.3389/fpsyt.2021.786691.


Validation of the Greek version of the distress thermometer compared to the clinical interview for depression.

Kyranou M, Varvara C, Papathanasiou M, Diakogiannis I, Zafeiropoulos K, Apostolidis M BMC Psychiatry. 2020; 20(1):527.

PMID: 33158431 PMC: 7648283. DOI: 10.1186/s12888-020-02926-0.


Parallel Journeys of Patients with Cancer and Depression: Challenges and Opportunities for Technology-Enabled Collaborative Care.

Suh J, Williams S, Fann J, Fogarty J, Bauer A, Hsieh G Proc ACM Hum Comput Interact. 2020; 4(CSCW1).

PMID: 32656502 PMC: 7351346. DOI: 10.1145/3392843.