» Articles » PMID: 10207539

Combination Therapy Containing Ritonavir Plus Saquinavir Has Superior Short-term Antiretroviral Efficacy: a Randomized Trial

Overview
Journal AIDS
Date 1999 Apr 20
PMID 10207539
Citations 16
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objectives: To compare the efficacy and safety of indinavir 800 mg three times a day, ritonavir 600 mg twice a day, and a combination of ritonavir 400 mg twice a day and saquinavir 400 mg twice a day, when administered with two nucleoside analogues.

Design: A randomized, open-labelled, controlled trial. Two hundred and eighty-four patients started randomized treatment. The primary end-point was the proportion of patients with HIV RNA of 200 copies/ml or less (Roche Amplicor) and HIV RNA of 20 copies/ml or less (Roche ultradirect assay) at 6 months. Analysis was performed as intent-to-treat, and missing values were accounted for as failures.

Results: As of 1 May 1998, 269 patients should have completed 24 weeks of treatment. The proportion of patients with HIV RNA of 200 copies/ml or less was 71% (indinavir), 67% (ritonavir), and 82% (ritonavir + saquinavir), P = 0.07. In antiretroviral drug-naive patients (n = 119), the corresponding figures were 63, 57, and 89% (P < 0.01), whereas among drug-experienced patients (n = 165) 77, 74, and 77% had HIV RNA of 200 copies/ml or less (P = 0.90). The same pattern was observed in the ultradirect analysis. All three regimens were generally safe, but significantly more patients in the ritonavir group (37%) stopped treatment because of adverse drug reactions compared with the indinavir group (8%) and the ritonavir plus saquinavir group (16%) (P < 0.001).

Conclusions: Treatment with saquinavir plus ritonavir in combination with two nucleoside analogues is generally safe, and has superior short-term antiviral efficacy compared with indinavir and ritonavir also combined with two nucleoside analogues in antiretroviral drug-naive patients. Further follow-up is needed to determine the durability of the viral response.

Citing Articles

Quadruple versus triple combination antiretroviral therapies for treatment naive people with HIV: systematic review and meta-analysis of randomised controlled trials.

Feng Q, Zhou A, Zou H, Ingle S, May M, Cai W BMJ. 2019; 366:l4179.

PMID: 31285198 PMC: 6613201. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.l4179.


Changes in first-line cART regimens and short-term clinical outcome between 1996 and 2010 in The Netherlands.

Smit M, Smit C, Geerlings S, Gras L, Brinkman K, Hallett T PLoS One. 2013; 8(9):e76071.

PMID: 24098764 PMC: 3786897. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0076071.


Feline immunodeficiency virus (FIV) as a model for study of lentivirus infections: parallels with HIV.

Elder J, Lin Y, Fink E, Grant C Curr HIV Res. 2010; 8(1):73-80.

PMID: 20210782 PMC: 2853889. DOI: 10.2174/157016210790416389.


The cost-effectiveness of counseling strategies to improve adherence to highly active antiretroviral therapy among men who have sex with men.

Zaric G, Bayoumi A, Brandeau M, Owens D Med Decis Making. 2008; 28(3):359-76.

PMID: 18349433 PMC: 3243050. DOI: 10.1177/0272989X07312714.


Molecular mechanisms of FIV infection.

Elder J, Sundstrom M, de Rozieres S, de Parseval A, Grant C, Lin Y Vet Immunol Immunopathol. 2008; 123(1-2):3-13.

PMID: 18289701 PMC: 2409060. DOI: 10.1016/j.vetimm.2008.01.007.