» Articles » PMID: 10202693

Accessibility and Perceived Value of Health Services in Five Western Illinois Rural Communities

Overview
Publisher Springer
Specialty Public Health
Date 1999 Apr 15
PMID 10202693
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

The purpose of this study was to determine the accessibility and perceived value of health services in five selected rural communities in South Fulton County, Illinois. The Health Services Accessibility and Value Scale (HSAVS) component of the larger Fulton County Health Care Survey was used in the investigation. The 12 items comprising the HSAVS surveyed participant perceptions relative to medical, dental, nursing, and public health department services available to them as rural residents. The HSAVS was completed by 1709 subjects. The reliability of the HSAVS was assessed by computing coefficient alpha. The scale had acceptable internal consistency reliability (alpha = .7884). To examine the construct validity of the scale, a principle component factor analysis was completed. This analysis resulted in a four factor solution which accounted for 66.6% of the cumulative total variance. Item means were calculated and were used to rank the HSAVS statements. Emergency and primary medical services were valued the most by the survey participants. Relatively high in importance to the rural residents surveyed were access to pharmacy, eye care, dental care, and immunization services. Availability of home health care, transportation to and from health care facilities, and access to mental health services were considered to be of lesser value to persons living in the rural area studied. Of least importance were alcohol and other drug counseling services, prenatal care/well baby services, and family planning services. HSAVS total scores and individual statements were also analyzed by sex, age, place of residence, and income and the results were reported.

Citing Articles

Does "Rural" Always Mean the Same? Macrosocial Determinants of Rural Populations' Health in Poland.

Ucieklak-Jez P, Bem A Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020; 17(2).

PMID: 31936149 PMC: 7013667. DOI: 10.3390/ijerph17020397.


How do Australian metropolitan and rural pharmacists counsel consumers with prescriptions?.

Puspitasari H, Aslani P, Krass I Pharm World Sci. 2009; 31(3):394-405.

PMID: 19259780 DOI: 10.1007/s11096-009-9289-9.

References
1.
Beck R, Jijon C, EDWARDS J . The relationships among gender, perceived financial barriers to care, and health status in a rural population. J Rural Health. 1996; 12(3):188-9. DOI: 10.1111/j.1748-0361.1996.tb00793.x. View

2.
Coward R, Cutler S . Informal and formal health care systems for the rural elderly. Health Serv Res. 1989; 23(6):785-806. PMC: 1065539. View

3.
Phillips D, Kruse J . Economic viability of a model rural family practice. Fam Med. 1995; 27(3):194-9. View

4.
. Rural primary care. American College of Physicians. Ann Intern Med. 1995; 122(5):380-90. View