» Articles » PMID: 10194289

Treatment and Posttreatment Effects of Acrylic Splint Herbst Appliance Therapy

Overview
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty Dentistry
Date 1999 Apr 8
PMID 10194289
Citations 28
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

This study evaluated the skeletal and dentoalveolar changes induced by acrylic splint Herbst therapy of Class II malocclusion. The treated group comprised 55 subjects with Class II malocclusion treated with the acrylic splint Herbst appliance followed by comprehensive edgewise therapy. The mean age at Time 1 (immediately before treatment) was 12 years and 10 months +/- 1 year and 2 months. The mean age at Time 2 (immediately after debonding of the Herbst appliance) and Time 3 (posttreatment) was 13 years and 10 months +/- 1 year and 2 months and 15 years and 2 months +/- 1 year and 4 months, respectively. The two control groups were one group of 30 subjects with untreated Class II malocclusion and another group of 33 subjects with Class I occlusion. The three groups were homogeneous as to the stage of maturation of cervical vertebrae at all observation times. A modification of Pancherz's cephalometric analysis was applied to the lateral cephalograms of the three groups at Time 1, Time 2, and Time 3. Linear and angular measurements for mandibular dimensions, cranial base angulation, and vertical relationships were added to the original analysis. Differences for all the variables from Time 1 to Time 2 (active treatment effects), from Time 2 to Time 3 (posttreatment effects), and from Time 1 to Time 3 (overall treatment effects) were calculated for the treated group and contrasted to corresponding differences of both untreated groups by means of ANOVA (P <.05). The study showed that two thirds of the achieved occlusal correction was due to skeletal effects and only one third to dentoalveolar adaptations. Both skeletal and dentoalveolar effects were due mainly to changes in mandibular structures. A significant amount of relapse in molar relationship occurred during the posttreatment period, and this change could be ascribed to the mesial movement of the upper molars.

Citing Articles

The Efficacy of the RME II System Compared with a Herbst Appliance in the Treatment of Class II Skeletal Malocclusion in Growing Patients: A Retrospective Study.

Ciavarella D, Lorusso M, Fanelli C, Ferrara D, Esposito R, Laurenziello M Dent J (Basel). 2024; 12(8).

PMID: 39195098 PMC: 11354209. DOI: 10.3390/dj12080254.


Comparative evaluation of efficacy of two Class II correctors in treatment of skeletal Class II malocclusion: A multicenter randomized controlled trial.

Agarwal S, Chaudhary D, Datana S, Jain D Med J Armed Forces India. 2024; 80(4):433-441.

PMID: 39071764 PMC: 11280293. DOI: 10.1016/j.mjafi.2023.03.011.


Efficacy of an innovative Herbst appliance with TADs for patients with hyperdivergent class II malocclusion: study protocol for a randomised controlled trial.

Wang Y, Xu Y, Gong Z, Pan J, Liu Y BMJ Open. 2023; 13(8):e071840.

PMID: 37620276 PMC: 10450085. DOI: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-071840.


Effects of fixed functional orthodontic treatment in hypodivergent and hyperdivergent class II patients-a retrospective cephalometric investigation.

Hourfar J, Kinzinger G, Frye L, Lisson J Clin Oral Investig. 2023; 27(8):4773-4784.

PMID: 37351654 PMC: 10415434. DOI: 10.1007/s00784-023-05105-z.


Mandibular orthopedic advancement in different facial patterns and distinct stages of skeletal maturation.

Silva F Dental Press J Orthod. 2021; 26(2):e21bbo2.

PMID: 34008742 PMC: 8130370. DOI: 10.1590/2177-6709.26.2.e21bbo2.