» Articles » PMID: 10193394

Comparison of Spontaneous and Induced Sputum for Investigation of Airway Inflammation in Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease

Overview
Journal Thorax
Date 1999 Apr 8
PMID 10193394
Citations 41
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Although sputum induction is used as a technique to investigate lower airway inflammation in asthmatic subjects, advantages over spontaneous sputum in patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) have not been investigated.

Methods: Samples of spontaneous sputum and sputum induced with 3% hypertonic saline for 14 minutes were collected from 27 patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who usually produced spontaneous sputum. Spirometric indices and oxygen saturation (Sao2) were measured at seven minute intervals. The spontaneous, seven and 14 minute sputum samples were analysed for total and differential cell counts, cell viability, and interleukin 8 levels.

Results: Analysis of the sputum revealed that median cell viability was higher in the seven minute (62.8%; p = 0.004) and 14 minute (65%; p = 0.001) induced sputum samples than in spontaneous sputum (41.2%). There was no significant difference in total and differential cell counts or in interleukin 8 levels between spontaneous and induced sputum. During the sputum induction procedure the mean (SD) fall in forced expiratory volume in one second (FEV1) was 0.098 (0.111) 1 (p < 0.001) and in forced vital capacity (FVC) was 0.247 (0.233) 1 (p < 0.001). There was a small but significant fall in Sao2 during sputum induction (p = 0.03).

Conclusions: Induced sputum contains a higher proportion of viable cells than spontaneous sputum. There are no significant differences between the sputum samples obtained at seven minutes and at 14 minutes of hypertonic saline nebulisation. Sputum induction is safe and well tolerated in patients with COPD.

Citing Articles

Development and qualification of an LC-MS/MS method for quantification of MUC5AC and MUC5B mucins in spontaneous sputum.

Sun W, Mou S, Huntington C, Killick H, Scott I, Kelly A Bioanalysis. 2025; 17(3):187-198.

PMID: 39976267 PMC: 11853556. DOI: 10.1080/17576180.2025.2457844.


Physiology and pathophysiology of mucus and mucolytic use in critically ill patients.

Roe T, Talbot T, Terrington I, Johal J, Kemp I, Saeed K Crit Care. 2025; 29(1):68.

PMID: 39920835 PMC: 11806889. DOI: 10.1186/s13054-025-05286-x.


Methodological Aspects of Induced Sputum.

Dragonieri S, Bikov A, Capuano A, Scarlata S, Carpagnano G Adv Respir Med. 2023; 91(5):397-406.

PMID: 37887074 PMC: 10603896. DOI: 10.3390/arm91050031.


Cytokine signature clusters as a tool to compare changes associated with tobacco product use in upper and lower airway samples.

Payton A, Perryman A, Hoffman J, Avula V, Wells H, Robinette C Am J Physiol Lung Cell Mol Physiol. 2022; 322(5):L722-L736.

PMID: 35318855 PMC: 9054348. DOI: 10.1152/ajplung.00299.2021.


Methods of Sputum and Mucus Assessment for Muco-Obstructive Lung Diseases in 2022: Time to "Unplug" from Our Daily Routine!.

Charriot J, Volpato M, Petit A, Vachier I, Bourdin A Cells. 2022; 11(5).

PMID: 35269434 PMC: 8909676. DOI: 10.3390/cells11050812.


References
1.
Pin I, Gibson P, Kolendowicz R, Girgis-Gabardo A, Denburg J, Hargreave F . Use of induced sputum cell counts to investigate airway inflammation in asthma. Thorax. 1992; 47(1):25-9. PMC: 463545. DOI: 10.1136/thx.47.1.25. View

2.
Nightingale J, Rogers D, Barnes P . Effect of repeated sputum induction on cell counts in normal volunteers. Thorax. 1998; 53(2):87-90. PMC: 1758720. DOI: 10.1136/thx.53.2.87. View

3.
Lacoste J, Bousquet J, Chanez P, van Vyve T, Simony-Lafontaine J, Lequeu N . Eosinophilic and neutrophilic inflammation in asthma, chronic bronchitis, and chronic obstructive pulmonary disease. J Allergy Clin Immunol. 1993; 92(4):537-48. DOI: 10.1016/0091-6749(93)90078-t. View

4.
Linden M, Rasmussen J, Piitulainen E, Tunek A, Larson M, Tegner H . Airway inflammation in smokers with nonobstructive and obstructive chronic bronchitis. Am Rev Respir Dis. 1993; 148(5):1226-32. DOI: 10.1164/ajrccm/148.5.1226. View

5.
Popov T, Gottschalk R, Kolendowicz R, Dolovich J, Powers P, Hargreave F . The evaluation of a cell dispersion method of sputum examination. Clin Exp Allergy. 1994; 24(8):778-83. DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2222.1994.tb00990.x. View