» Articles » PMID: 10185139

Mammography: Influence of Departmental Practice and Women's Characteristics on Patient Satisfaction: Comparison of Six Departments in Norway

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 1998 Aug 5
PMID 10185139
Citations 6
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To investigate how departmental practice and women's characteristics are related to low patient satisfaction with mammography.

Design: Survey of patients by means of self administered questionnaires before and after mammography.

Patients: 488 women (89% of those invited), aged 23-86 years, at six departments.

Main Outcome Measures: Low level of satisfaction measured on psychometric scales of physical pain, psychological distress, staff punctuality and technical skills, information provided, and physical surroundings.

Results: Satisfaction varied by department on the scales for pain, punctuality, information, and surroundings. After adjustment for women's characteristics an attributable risk of negative outcome by department was identified on the scales for pain, distress, punctuality, information, and surroundings. Adjusted odds ratio (ORs) ranged from 0.3 (95% confidence interval (95% CI) 1.2 to 6.0) on the pain scale, to 6.0 (2.9 to 12.3) on the punctuality scale. After adjustment for confounding variables, higher risk of dissatisfaction was associated with age < 50, nervousness about mammography, expected pain, lack of knowledge about mammography, and distrust in mammography (adjusted OR (95% CI) ranged from 1.6 (1.0 to 2.7) to 3.7 (2.0 to 7.3)).

Conclusion: Departmental practices differed for breast compression, information, punctuality, and facilities and were associated with a low level of satisfaction irrespective of patient characteristics. Women's lack of knowledge about mammography and distrust in the procedure were confirmed as risk factors for dissatisfaction. All these factors might be helped by training the staff, improving facilities, and informing the women.

Citing Articles

The Psychological Impact of Referral for Mammography Screening for Breast Cancer Among Women in Muscat Governorate: A cross-sectional study.

Al-Alawi N, Al-Balushi N, Al Salmani A Sultan Qaboos Univ Med J. 2019; 19(3):e225-e229.

PMID: 31728220 PMC: 6839681. DOI: 10.18295/squmj.2019.19.03.008.


Self-compression Technique vs Standard Compression in Mammography: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

Henrot P, Boisserie-Lacroix M, Boute V, Troufleau P, Boyer B, Lesanne G JAMA Intern Med. 2019; 179(3):407-414.

PMID: 30715083 PMC: 6440229. DOI: 10.1001/jamainternmed.2018.7169.


Development and validation of an instrument assessing women's satisfaction with screening mammography in an organized breast cancer screening program.

Bairati I, Turcotte S, Doray G, Belleau F, Gregoire L BMC Health Serv Res. 2014; 14:9.

PMID: 24397342 PMC: 3893508. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6963-14-9.


Assessment of mammography experiences and satisfaction among American Indian/Alaska Native women.

Ndikum-Moffor F, Braiuca S, Daley C, Gajewski B, Engelman K Womens Health Issues. 2013; 23(6):e395-402.

PMID: 24183414 PMC: 3885991. DOI: 10.1016/j.whi.2013.08.003.


An assessment of American Indian women's mammography experiences.

Engelman K, Daley C, Gajewski B, Ndikum-Moffor F, Faseru B, Braiuca S BMC Womens Health. 2010; 10:34.

PMID: 21159197 PMC: 3018433. DOI: 10.1186/1472-6874-10-34.


References
1.
Fallowfield L, Rodway A, Baum M . What are the psychological factors influencing attendance, non-attendance and re-attendance at a breast screening centre?. J R Soc Med. 1990; 83(9):547-51. PMC: 1292810. DOI: 10.1177/014107689008300905. View

2.
Ward S, Gordon D . Application of the American Pain Society quality assurance standards. Pain. 1994; 56(3):299-306. DOI: 10.1016/0304-3959(94)90168-6. View

3.
Nielsen B, Miaskowski C, McCoy C, Rudisch M . The development and implementation of standards of care in a breast cancer screening program. Oncol Nurs Forum. 1991; 18(1):67-72. View

4.
Wareham N . External monitoring of quality of health care in the United States. Qual Health Care. 1994; 3(2):97-101. PMC: 1055204. DOI: 10.1136/qshc.3.2.97. View

5.
Davies A . Patient defined outcomes. Qual Health Care. 1994; 3 Suppl:6-9. PMC: 1056040. DOI: 10.1136/qshc.3.suppl.6. View