» Articles » PMID: 10146939

Quality of Life Evaluation of Antihypertensive Drugs

Overview
Specialty Pharmacology
Date 1992 Jan 9
PMID 10146939
Citations 9
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Eleven studies (10 randomised controlled trials and 1 large open study) that evaluated quality of life (QOL) are reviewed. The areas of QOL measured by the studies are compared and a consensus is reported that health-related QOL measures in patients with hypertension should include: symptomatic and psychological well-being, activity (work, leisure, sleep, sexual activity and social participation), cognitive function and life satisfaction. Recommended methods for measuring these aspects of QOL are noted. Seven studies included atenolol as 1 of the treatments and the effects of this drug on QOL are reviewed. The drug appears to maintain QOL as well as the angiotensin converting enzyme (ACE) inhibitors captopril, enalapril and cilazapril. One trial also suggests that verapamil maintains QOL as well as atenolol, although this was not suggested by the nonrandomised study. Nifedipine slow release (SR) and propranolol both fared worse than atenolol in 2 separate trials, but 1 trial suggested that nifedipine gastrointestinal therapeutic system (GITS) was preferred to atenolol in terms of QOL. In the latter study, however, only patients completing the prescribed therapy revealed a preference for nifedipine GITS; this was absent in an intention-to-treat analysis. The rate of discontinuation of nifedipine therapy was high, underlining the necessity for an intention-to-treat analysis in trials assessing QOL.

Citing Articles

Effect of antihypertensive agents on quality of life in the elderly.

Fogari R, Zoppi A Drugs Aging. 2004; 21(6):377-93.

PMID: 15084140 DOI: 10.2165/00002512-200421060-00003.


The relationship between quality of life and adherence to treatment.

Nunes M Curr Hypertens Rep. 2001; 3(6):462-5.

PMID: 11734090 DOI: 10.1007/s11906-001-0007-9.


Metoprolol: a pharmacoeconomic and quality-of-life evaluation of its use in hypertension, post-myocardial infarction and dilated cardiomyopathy.

Peters D, Benfield P Pharmacoeconomics. 1994; 6(4):370-400.

PMID: 10147474 DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199406040-00004.


Enalapril: a review of quality-of-life and pharmacoeconomic aspects of its use in heart failure and mild to moderate hypertension.

Wilde M, Bryson H, Goa K Pharmacoeconomics. 1994; 6(2):155-82.

PMID: 10147441 DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199406020-00008.


Health-related quality of life in pharmaceutical evaluation: forging progress and avoiding pitfalls.

Patrick D Pharmacoeconomics. 1992; 1(2):76-8.

PMID: 10146936 DOI: 10.2165/00019053-199201020-00002.


References
1.
. Managing hypertension in family practice: a nationwide collaborative study of the use of four antihypertensives in the treatment of mild-to-moderate hypertension. A report from CEN. Clinical Experience Network. J Am Board Fam Pract. 1989; 2(3):172-90; discussion 190. View

2.
Fletcher A, Chester P, Hawkins C, Latham A, Pike L, Bulpitt C . The effects of verapamil and propranolol on quality of life in hypertension. J Hum Hypertens. 1989; 3(2):125-30. View

3.
Croog S, Kong B, Levine S, Weir M, Baume R, Saunders E . Hypertensive black men and women. Quality of life and effects of antihypertensive medications. Black Hypertension Quality of Life Multicenter Trial Group. Arch Intern Med. 1990; 150(8):1733-41. DOI: 10.1001/archinte.150.8.1733. View

4.
Herrick A, Waller P, Berkin K, Pringle S, Callender J, Robertson M . Comparison of enalapril and atenolol in mild to moderate hypertension. Am J Med. 1989; 86(4):421-6. DOI: 10.1016/0002-9343(89)90340-9. View

5.
Steiner S, Friedhoff A, Wilson B, Wecker J, Santo J . Antihypertensive therapy and quality of life: a comparison of atenolol, captopril, enalapril and propranolol. J Hum Hypertens. 1990; 4(3):217-25. View