» Articles » PMID: 10136871

Development of Clinical Guidelines in a Health District: an Attempt to Find Consensus

Overview
Specialty Health Services
Date 1992 Nov 4
PMID 10136871
Citations 3
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Objective: To formulate consensus based guidelines for antenatal care in a health district.

Design: Prospective formulation of draft guidelines by a working group of consultant obstetricians and general practitioners with an obstetric interest, canvassing opinions of all GPs in the district by questionnaire, and revision and final circulation of the guidelines.

Setting: One health district.

Subjects: All 160 GPs in the district and members of the working party.

Main Measures: Questionnaire responses to specific proposals within the draft guidelines for managing anaemia, antepartum haemorrhage, and hypertension.

Results: 136 GPs responded (response rate 85%); responders and nonresponders did not differ in age, sex, or presence on obstetric list. Overall they favoured more conservative management than suggested in the guidelines. For example, only 38% (44/116) prescribed iron routinely and 34% (38/113) referred to hospital for haemoglobin concentration of < or = 10 g/l; 10% referred women unnecessarily for oedema unassociated with proteinuria; and 20% managed active bleeding progressing to old brown staining as an urgent admission. The guidelines were revised according to the relative weight of the views obtained.

Conclusion: Establishing guidelines is mainly a political process. Canvassed views influenced guidelines most when internal disagreement existed within the working party.

Implications And Action: Regular revising of the guidelines is planned, which, in conjunction with repeating the questionnaire to monitor changing practice, will allow a long term district wide clinical review.

Citing Articles

Guidelines and management of mild hypertensive conditions in pregnancy in rural general practices in Scotland: issues of appropriateness and access.

Tucker J, Farmer J, Stimpson P Qual Saf Health Care. 2003; 12(4):286-90.

PMID: 12897362 PMC: 1743728. DOI: 10.1136/qhc.12.4.286.


The quantity and quality of clinical practice guidelines for the management of depression in primary care in the UK.

Littlejohns P, Cluzeau F, Bale R, Grimshaw J, Feder G, Moran S Br J Gen Pract. 1999; 49(440):205-10.

PMID: 10343424 PMC: 1313373.


Setting standards: from passing fashion to essential clinical activity.

Jewell D Qual Health Care. 1992; 1(4):217-8.

PMID: 10136866 PMC: 1055028. DOI: 10.1136/qshc.1.4.217.

References
1.
Fink A, Kosecoff J, Chassin M, Brook R . Consensus methods: characteristics and guidelines for use. Am J Public Health. 1984; 74(9):979-83. PMC: 1651783. DOI: 10.2105/ajph.74.9.979. View

2.
Kosecoff J, Kanouse D, Rogers W, McCloskey L, Winslow C, Brook R . Effects of the National Institutes of Health Consensus Development Program on physician practice. JAMA. 1987; 258(19):2708-13. View

3.
Armstrong D, GRIFFIN G . Patterns of work in general practice in the Bromley health district. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1987; 37(299):264-6. PMC: 1710903. View

4.
Eddy D . Clinical decision making: from theory to practice. Designing a practice policy. Standards, guidelines, and options. JAMA. 1990; 263(22):3077, 3081, 3084. DOI: 10.1001/jama.263.22.3077. View

5.
Grol R . National standard setting for quality of care in general practice: attitudes of general practitioners and response to a set of standards. Br J Gen Pract. 1990; 40(338):361-4. PMC: 1371343. View