Breast Cancer Screening by Mammography in Norway. Is It Cost-effective?
Overview
Authors
Affiliations
Background: Mammography screening is a promising method for improving prognosis in breast cancer.
Patients And Methods: In this economic analysis, data from the Norwegian Mammography Project (NMP), the National Health Administration (NMA) and the Norwegian Medical Association (NMA) were employed in a model for cost-effectiveness analysis. According to the annual report of the NMP for 1996, 60,147 women aged 50-69 years had been invited to a two-yearly mammographic screening programme 46,329 (77%) had been screened and 337 (0.7%) breast cancers had been revealed. The use of breast conserving surgery (BCS) was in this study estimated raised by 17% due to screening, the breast cancer mortality decreased by 30% and the number of life years saved per prevented breast cancer death was calculated 15 years.
Results: The cost per woman screened was calculated 75.4 Pounds, the cost per cancer detected 10.365 Pounds and the cost per life year (LY) saved 8.561 Pounds. A raised frequency of BCS, diagnosis and adjuvant chemotherapy brought two years forward, follow-up costs and costs/savings due to prevented breast cancer deaths were all included in the analysis. A sensitivity analysis documented mammography screening cost-effective in Norway when four to nine years are gained per prevented breast cancer death.
Conclusion: Mammography screening in Norway looks cost-effective. Time has come to encourage national screening programmes.
Augustynowicz A, Czerw A, Deptala A Arch Med Sci. 2018; 14(6):1439-1449.
PMID: 30393500 PMC: 6209714. DOI: 10.5114/aoms.2016.62283.
Moger T, Bjornelv G, Aas E Eur J Health Econ. 2015; 17(6):745-54.
PMID: 26239280 DOI: 10.1007/s10198-015-0719-4.
Cost effectiveness of breast cancer screening using mammography; a systematic review.
Rashidian A, Barfar E, Hosseini H, Nosratnejad S, Barooti E Iran J Public Health. 2013; 42(4):347-57.
PMID: 23785673 PMC: 3684720.
Implications of ICU triage decisions on patient mortality: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
Edbrooke D, Minelli C, Mills G, Iapichino G, Pezzi A, Corbella D Crit Care. 2011; 15(1):R56.
PMID: 21306645 PMC: 3221989. DOI: 10.1186/cc10029.