An Electrocardiographic Algorithm for the Prediction of the Culprit Lesion Site in Acute Anterior Myocardial Infarction
Overview
Affiliations
Background: Although the 12-lead electrocardiogram (ECG) has been found useful in identifying the left anterior descending (LAD) coronary artery as the infarct-related artery in acute myocardial infarction (MI), it has traditionally been felt to be incapable of localizing the culprit lesion within the LAD itself. Such a capability would be important, because anterior MI due to proximal LAD lesions carry a much worse prognosis than those due to more distal or branch vessel lesions.
Hypothesis: This study investigated whether certain ECG variables--especially an ST-segment injury pattern in leads aVL and/or V1--would correlate with culprit lesion site, and an ECG algorithm was developed to predict culprit lesion site.
Methods: The initial ECGs of 55 patients who had undergone cardiac catheterization after an anterior or lateral MI were reviewed to identify the leads with an ST-segment injury pattern; the corresponding catheterization films were then reviewed to identify the location of the culprit lesion; and these separate findings were then compared.
Results: The sensitivity and specificity of an ST-injury pattern in aVL in predicting a culprit lesion before the first diagonal branch were 91 and 90%, respectively; the same values in predicting a lesion prior to the first septal branch were 85 and 78%. ST-segment elevation in V1, on the other hand, was a much less sensitive and specific predictor of a preseptal lesion. Overall, our algorithm correctly identified the culprit lesion location in 82% of our patients.
Conclusion: Based on our findings, we conclude that a ST-segment injury pattern in aVL during an anterior myocardial infarction predominantly reflects a proximal LAD lesion and therefore constitutes a high-risk finding.
Arora N, Mishra B Healthc Technol Lett. 2023; 10(3):35-52.
PMID: 37265835 PMC: 10230560. DOI: 10.1049/htl2.12043.
Tseng L, Chuang C, Chua S, Tseng V IEEE J Transl Eng Health Med. 2023; 11:70-79.
PMID: 36654772 PMC: 9842227. DOI: 10.1109/JTEHM.2022.3227204.
Myocardial infarction with ventricular septal rupture and cardiogenic shock.
Glancy D, Khuri B, Mustapha J, Menon P, Hanna E Proc (Bayl Univ Med Cent). 2015; 28(4):512-3.
PMID: 26424959 PMC: 4569242. DOI: 10.1080/08998280.2015.11929327.
Fiol M, Carrillo A, Cygankiewicz I, Velasco J, Riera M, Bayes-Genis A Clin Cardiol. 2009; 32(11):E1-6.
PMID: 19816974 PMC: 6652907. DOI: 10.1002/clc.20347.
Bayes de Luna A, Zareba W Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol. 2007; 12(1):1-4.
PMID: 17286644 PMC: 6932657. DOI: 10.1111/j.1542-474X.2007.00144.x.