» Articles » PMID: 10030325

Effect of Angiotensin-converting-enzyme Inhibition Compared with Conventional Therapy on Cardiovascular Morbidity and Mortality in Hypertension: the Captopril Prevention Project (CAPPP) Randomised Trial

Overview
Journal Lancet
Publisher Elsevier
Specialty General Medicine
Date 1999 Feb 25
PMID 10030325
Citations 340
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Angiotensin-converting-enzyme (ACE) inhibitors have been used for more than a decade to treat high blood pressure, despite the lack of data from randomised intervention trials to show that such treatment affects cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The Captopril Prevention Project (CAPPP) is a randomised intervention trial to compare the effects of ACE inhibition and conventional therapy on cardiovascular morbidity and mortality in patients with hypertension.

Methods: CAPPP was a prospective, randomised, open trial with blinded endpoint evaluation. 10,985 patients were enrolled at 536 health centres in Sweden and Finland. Patients aged 25-66 years with a measured diastolic blood pressure of 100 mm Hg or more on two occasions were randomly assigned captopril or conventional antihypertensive treatment (diuretics, beta-blockers). Analysis was by intention-to-treat. The primary endpoint was a composite of fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction, stroke, and other cardiovascular deaths.

Findings: Of 5492 patients assigned captopril and 5493 assigned conventional therapy, 14 and 13, respectively, were lost to follow-up. Primary endpoint events occurred in 363 patients in the captopril group (11.1 per 1000 patient-years) and 335 in the conventional-treatment group (10.2 per 1000 patient-years; relative risk 1.05 [95% CI 0.90-1.22], p=0-52). Cardiovascular mortality was lower with captopril than with conventional treatment (76 vs 95 events; relative risk 0.77 [0.57-1-04], p=0.092), the rate of fatal and non-fatal myocardial infarction was similar (162 vs 161), but fatal and non-fatal stroke was more common with captopril (189 vs 148; 1.25 [1-01-1-55]. p=0.044).

Interpretation: Captopril and conventional treatment did not differ in efficacy in preventing cardiovascular morbidity and mortality. The difference in stroke risk is probably due to the lower levels of blood pressure obtained initially in previously treated patients randomised to conventional therapy.

Citing Articles

Comparative efficacy of different antihypertensive drug classes for stroke prevention: A network meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.

Yu D, Li J, Cheng Y, Wang H, Ma X, Ding T PLoS One. 2025; 20(2):e0313309.

PMID: 39982885 PMC: 11845040. DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0313309.


ACE Inhibitors and Angiotensin Receptor Blockers for the Prevention of Cardiovascular Outcomes: Recommendations from the 2024 Egyptian Cardiology Expert Consensus.

Poulter N Cardiol Ther. 2025; .

PMID: 39964662 DOI: 10.1007/s40119-025-00399-4.


Initial treatment with a single capsule containing half-dose quadruple therapy vs standard-dose dual therapy in hypertensive patients (QUADUAL): a randomized, blinded, crossover trial.

Zhao X, Liu T, Yang Q, Yang G, Li X, Tang X BMC Med. 2025; 23(1):56.

PMID: 39881316 PMC: 11780824. DOI: 10.1186/s12916-025-03892-8.


Renin-Angiotensin-Aldosterone System Modulators in Adults with Hypertension: A Network Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials.

Yi X, Yang S, Yang J, Chen X, Zhang A, Zeng Q Drugs. 2024; 84(11):1445-1462.

PMID: 39312177 DOI: 10.1007/s40265-024-02092-7.


Agreement Between Mega-Trials and Smaller Trials: A Systematic Review and Meta-Research Analysis.

Kastrati L, Raeisi-Dehkordi H, Llanaj E, Quezada-Pinedo H, Khatami F, Ahanchi N JAMA Netw Open. 2024; 7(9):e2432296.

PMID: 39240561 PMC: 11380108. DOI: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2024.32296.