» Articles » PMID: 10024704

Computer Use by General Practitioners in Scotland

Overview
Journal Br J Gen Pract
Specialty Public Health
Date 1999 Feb 20
PMID 10024704
Citations 2
Authors
Affiliations
Soon will be listed here.
Abstract

Background: Despite the widespread adoption by general practitioners (GPs) of desktop computers, there has been very little evaluation of the way in which the computer is actually used during consultations and the way in which it affects patient satisfaction.

Aim: To ascertain the extent to which the computer is used in the consultation and to investigate the possible relationship between computer use and patient satisfaction.

Method: Six GPs completed a short questionnaire about the extent to which they use the computer during surgeries. Eighty-four consultations from the surgeries of these GPs were video recorded. Patient satisfaction data on these 84 patients were collected at the time of the surgery using the previously validated Consultation Satisfaction Questionnaire.

Results: All six GPs stated that they usually used the computer during consultations. However, video observation revealed that the computer was used in just 51% of surgeries. The proportion of time that the computer was used for varied from 0.03 to 0.4, with a mean value of 0.12. The commonest function for which the computer was used was prescribing. The consultations in which the computer was used (CU) were on average 148 seconds longer than the non-computerized consultations (NCU). There was no difference in patient satisfaction between the two groups.

Conclusion: Despite this group of GPs having a self-declared interest in the use of computers, the extent to which the computer was used was much lower than expected from the GPs' self-reported use. This may be partly explained by the fact that using the computer takes up valuable time within the consultation and does not appear to contribute to patient satisfaction. If desktop computers are to be used to their full potential in general practice, more work is required to evaluate their impact on the consultation process itself.

Citing Articles

e-Prescribing, efficiency, quality: lessons from the computerization of UK family practice.

Schade C, Sullivan F, de Lusignan S, Madeley J J Am Med Inform Assoc. 2006; 13(5):470-5.

PMID: 16799129 PMC: 1561797. DOI: 10.1197/jamia.M2041.


The relationship between consultation length, process and outcomes in general practice: a systematic review.

Wilson A, Childs S Br J Gen Pract. 2003; 52(485):1012-20.

PMID: 12528590 PMC: 1314474.

References
1.
Herzmark G, Brownbridge G, Fitter M, Evans A . Consultation use of a computer by general practitioners. J R Coll Gen Pract. 1984; 34(269):649-54. PMC: 1960088. View

2.
Pringle M, Robins S, Brown G . Computer assisted screening: effect on the patient and his consultation. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1985; 290(6483):1709-12. PMC: 1416093. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.290.6483.1709. View

3.
Pringle M, Robins S, Brown G . Timer: a new objective measure of consultation content and its application to computer assisted consultations. Br Med J (Clin Res Ed). 1986; 293(6538):20-2. PMC: 1340772. DOI: 10.1136/bmj.293.6538.20. View

4.
Weingarten M, Bazel D, Shannon H . Computerized protocol for preventive medicine: a controlled self-audit in family practice. Fam Pract. 1989; 6(2):120-4. DOI: 10.1093/fampra/6.2.120. View

5.
Baker R . Development of a questionnaire to assess patients' satisfaction with consultations in general practice. Br J Gen Pract. 1990; 40(341):487-90. PMC: 1371443. View